The report, commissioned by Google, analyzed the practical effect default protections bundled with each browser had on a wide class of exploits. Each browser was compared on a layered perspective, taking into account security architecture and anti-exploitation techniques according to Chris Valasek, Accuvant LABS senior research scientist.
“Our researchers used a completely different and more extensive methodology than previous, similar studies,” said Mr. Valasek in a statement.
Mr. Valasek told The Register that Accuvant ranked Google’s Chrome browser the most secure because it did the most ‘sandboxing’. This process, explained Mr. Valasek to The Register, is a hallmark of good security because it isolates application code inside a perimeter that is sealed off from the rest of the OS. Chrome, for instance, doesn’t allow the browser to access files outside of a limited set of directories.
Accuvant says that the sandbox found in Internet Explorer is much more permissive, allowing browser resources to read almost all parts of a hard drive.
“The Google Chrome token is far more restrictive,” said Accuvant Chief Research Scientist Ryan Smith, to The Register. “It’s more like a learner’s permit, whereas the Internet Explorer token is more like a regular driver’s license.”
According to the report, the least secure browser was Mozilla’s Firefox as it allowed the most access to the host machine’s operating system.







